-
-
The New York Innovation Center bridges the worlds of finance, technology, and innovation and generates insights into high-value central bank-related opportunities.
Do you have a request for information and records? Learn how to submit it.
Learn about the history of the New York Fed and central banking in the United States through articles, speeches, photos and video.
-
-
-
The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.
Need to file a report with the New York Fed? Here are all of the forms, instructions and other information related to regulatory and statistical reporting in one spot.
The New York Fed works to protect consumers as well as provides information and resources on how to avoid and report specific scams.
-
-
-
The New York Innovation Center bridges the worlds of finance, technology, and innovation and generates insights into high-value central bank-related opportunities.
The growing role of nonbank financial institutions, or NBFIs, in U.S. financial markets is a transformational trend with implications for monetary policy and financial stability.
The New York Fed offers the Central Banking Seminar and several specialized courses for central bankers and financial supervisors.
-
-
-
We are connecting emerging solutions with funding in three areas—health, household financial stability, and climate—to improve life for underserved communities. Learn more by reading our strategy.
The Economic Inequality & Equitable Growth hub is a collection of research, analysis and convenings to help better understand economic inequality.
The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.
-
August 10, 1999
NOTE TO EDITORS
The latest edition of the New York Fed’s Current Issues in Economics and Finance, entitled Are Banks Still Important for Financing Large Businesses? is available for your review.
New York Fed economists Marc Saidenberg and Philip Strahan find that despite the growth of alternative sources of funding, banks still play a significant part in providing liquidity to large corporations, particularly during periods of economic stress. They conclude that by providing a back-up source of liquidity, banks help insulate large corporations from market shocks.
Over the past three decades, corporations have increasingly turned to securities markets in place of banks to obtain credit. Today, most large, highly rated corporations rely on the commercial paper market to fulfill their short-term credit needs. Commercial paper, an unsecured form of debt, is attractive because it usually carries an interest rate lower than that on a comparable bank loan.
Under certain circumstances, however, turmoil in the financial markets can cause the interest rates on commercial paper to rise. For example, in the fall of 1998, after the Russian government announced its intention to default on its bonds, the yield spread between commercial paper rates and short-term Treasury bill rates more than doubled.
According to Saidenberg and Strahan, firms routinely secure a commercial paper backup line of credit with a bank to protect against such rate hikes. Saidenberg and Strahan show that in the fall of 1998, as borrowing in the commercial paper market grew too expensive, many businesses drew on these preexisting lines of credit until interest rates stabilized.
Saidenberg and Strahan also find that banks have an edge over other financial institutions as providers of liquidity insurance because they offer committed lending and deposit-taking services. Banks tend to experience deposit inflows when liquidity elsewhere dries up. This inflow of deposits enables banks to economize on the quantity of cash and safe securities they hold throughout the year. Banks can then offer liquidity insurance to customers at a lower price.
To provide liquidity on demand, other financial institutions would need to maintain large amounts of cash and safe securities as assets. Saidenberg and Strahan find that such an approach would be costly because these assets generally do not provide a high rate of return.
Contact: Douglas Tillett
