At the New York Fed, our mission is to make the U.S. economy stronger and the financial system more stable for all segments of society. We do this by executing monetary policy, providing financial services, supervising banks and conducting research and providing expertise on issues that impact the nation and communities we serve.
The New York Innovation Center bridges the worlds of finance, technology, and innovation and generates insights into high-value central bank-related opportunities.
Do you have a request for information and records? Learn how to submit it.
Learn about the history of the New York Fed and central banking in the United States through articles, speeches, photos and video.
As part of our core mission, we supervise and regulate financial institutions in the Second District. Our primary objective is to maintain a safe and competitive U.S. and global banking system.
The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.
Need to file a report with the New York Fed? Here are all of the forms, instructions and other information related to regulatory and statistical reporting in one spot.
The New York Fed works to protect consumers as well as provides information and resources on how to avoid and report specific scams.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York works to promote sound and well-functioning financial systems and markets through its provision of industry and payment services, advancement of infrastructure reform in key markets and training and educational support to international institutions.
The New York Innovation Center bridges the worlds of finance, technology, and innovation and generates insights into high-value central bank-related opportunities.
The growing role of nonbank financial institutions, or NBFIs, in U.S. financial markets is a transformational trend with implications for monetary policy and financial stability.
The New York Fed offers the Central Banking Seminar and several specialized courses for central bankers and financial supervisors.
We are connecting emerging solutions with funding in three areas—health, household financial stability, and climate—to improve life for underserved communities. Learn more by reading our strategy.
The Economic Inequality & Equitable Growth hub is a collection of research, analysis and convenings to help better understand economic inequality.
The Governance & Culture Reform hub is designed to foster discussion about corporate governance and the reform of culture and behavior in the financial services industry.
July 2, 2001
NOTE TO EDITORS
Investing in Information Technology: Productivity Payoffs for U.S. Industries, the latest edition of the New York Fed's Current Issues in Economics and Finance, is enclosed for your review.
Using industry-level data, senior economist Kevin Stiroh provides strong evidence that information technology (IT) contributed significantly to the U.S. productivity revival of the late 1990s. Stiroh shows that the industries experiencing the largest productivity acceleration during this period were the producers and most intensive users of information technology.
Stiroh's findings counter the argument of the "IT skeptics," who maintain that the surge in aggregate productivity at the end of the last decade can be traced largely to the narrow group of industries that actually manufacture computer hardware and to the strength of the economy. By contrast, Stiroh contends that a broad spectrum of industriesthose who use information technology intensively as well as those who produce ithave driven the productivity revival.
To assess the breadth of the revival, Stiroh uses 1987-99 output and employment data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis to construct a measure of labor productivity for the ten broad sectors of the U.S. economy and their sixty-one constituent industries. He then compares productivity growth for the 1987-95 period with productivity growth for the 1995-99 period. His results indicate that all of the principal sectors and a majority of individual industries experienced accelerating productivity growth after 1995.
To determine whether these productivity increases were linked to IT investment, Stiroh first calculates the current dollar share of IT capital in total reproducible, nonresidential assets for each of the ten sectors and sixty-one industries. After separating out the two industries that produce IT equipment, he uses the IT capital share to divide the remaining industries into those that use IT intensively (defined as industries with an IT capital share above the 1995 median) and all others.
The author then relates the observed differences in IT capital shares to differences in productivity growth. The greatest acceleration in productivity growth3.7 percentage pointswas achieved, as one would expect, by the IT-producing industries. The industries that use IT intensively, however, also realized substantial productivity gains. The mean productivity acceleration for this group was 2.0 percentage pointsconsiderably greater than the 0.4 percentage point acceleration shown by other industries. "These results," the author notes, "suggest an important link between IT use and productivity gains."
Contact: Peter Bakstansky or Steven Malin